Excel Parking Sheffield: Pensioner given '0' minutes to buy ticket 'fined' £100 for taking too long

Watch more of our videos on ShotsTV.com 
and on Freeview 262 or Freely 565
Visit Shots! now
The firm said it was ‘satisfied’ Mr Walker was in breach of the terms and conditions and the charge was valid.

A disabled pensioner has received a demand for £100 after being given zero minutes to buy a parking ticket.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Derrick Walker was told by Sheffield-based Excel Parking he failed to pay in the time allowed. In a letter it said: "The Maximum period allowed at this site is 0 minutes."

Derrick Walker received a letter from Sheffield-based Excel Parking stating he had failed to pay in the time allowed. It added: ‘The Maximum period allowed at this site is 0 minutes’.
Derrick Walker received a letter from Sheffield-based Excel Parking stating he had failed to pay in the time allowed. It added: ‘The Maximum period allowed at this site is 0 minutes’.
Derrick Walker received a letter from Sheffield-based Excel Parking stating he had failed to pay in the time allowed. It added: ‘The Maximum period allowed at this site is 0 minutes’. | Other

While he was appealing he says the amount went up to £170. He has also received a letter warning of court action.

Mr Walker, aged 73, of Shireoaks Road, Shireoaks, used a site on Newcastle Avenue, Worksop, where signs state drivers have five minutes to pay.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

But parking, downloading an app and inputting his bank details took 18 minutes.

He added: "I was attempting to register on my mobile and set up payment with HSBC, which I would argue would take an IT literate person more than 0 minutes.

"I  have no confidence in anything that Excel Parking does."

Hide Ad
Hide Ad
Excel Parking explained: “Although the PCN specified that the maximum period was 0 (zero), this is only populated with a positive value when a maximum Stay car park is applicable."Excel Parking explained: “Although the PCN specified that the maximum period was 0 (zero), this is only populated with a positive value when a maximum Stay car park is applicable."
Excel Parking explained: “Although the PCN specified that the maximum period was 0 (zero), this is only populated with a positive value when a maximum Stay car park is applicable." | other

The firm said it was 'satisfied' Mr Walker was in breach of the terms and conditions and the charge was valid.

Mr Walker said he appealed to Excel and the Independent Appeals Service, run by trade body, International Parking Community, but was unsuccessful.

The Star contacted the IPC to ask whether it had investigated drivers being given 0 minutes to pay and how many had been charged. We asked whether the error had been fixed and to provide independent proof. It did not respond.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Excel’s machines and systems have been queried previously at this site and others. It has also taken people to court for minor errors.

The IPC is funded by parking firms including Excel. Excel boss, Simon Renshaw-Smith sits on the IPC steering committee.

An Excel Parking spokesperson said: "At the outset, we would highlight that the Parking Charge Notice (PCN) was issued on 06 September 2023 and despite at least four subsequent reminders and letters, Mr Walker. has not been in contact with us directly. He had an opportunity to submit an appeal within the specified timeframe, but did not do so. Naturally, the costs associated with the PCN has increased.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

"!The signage at the car park made it clear that the appropriate parking tariff needs to be purchased within 5 minutes of arrival. Whilst the car park has various methods of payment, cash, card, pay by phone, it took, Mr Walker more than 15 minutes to purchase the tariff and as such he was significantly over the time allowed. Had he experienced problems when purchasing the tariff he could have contacted our prominently advertised helpline number.

"The PCN specified the reason why it was issued, i.e. 'Failure to purchase the parking tariff for the registration mark of the vehicle on site and/or within the time allowed'.

"Although the PCN specified that the maximum period was 0 (zero), this is only populated with a positive value when a maximum Stay car park is applicable.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

"In, Mr Walker's case, the type and use of the car park was advertised as a 24 hour Pay car park on the highly visible signage along with tariffs of up to 24 hours. 

"We are satisfied that, Mr Walker was in breach of the terms and conditions of parking and that the PCN remains valid."

Private parking firms issue Parking Charge Notices, which sound similar to Penalty Charge Notices issued by the council and police, they also have the same initials: PCN.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

But many say they are simply invoices for allegedly breaching a parking company’s terms and conditions. 

Ageco.co.uk, part of charity Age UK, states: 'Although parking charge notices are sometimes referred to as ‘fines’, it is often argued it is simply an invoice requesting payment in what has been perceived as a breach of agreement between a car park operator and the driver.

'This means that it can be disputed directly with the owners of the car park, and it’s possible that you may even find that you have no obligation to pay them anything at all'.

Citizens Advice states: 'The Parking Charge Notice might look like an official fixed penalty from the police but it isn't one.’

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.