Boss bemoans "naive" Sheffield United after late Reading defeat

Sheffield United boss Paul Heckingbottom says his side were “naïve” in conceding an injury-time winner to Reading this afternoon, just minutes after equalising themselves.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

Reading led since the first half thanks to a good finish from former Sheffield Wednesday striker Lucas Joao, but United – who were well below par in the first half – improved slightly in the second, leading to a 90th-minute equaliser from substitute Iliman Ndiaye.

With Bramall Lane erupting and expecting a push for a Blades winner in the five minutes of injury time, United instead conceded a simple goal as Tom McIntyre finished off after a knockdown into his path.

Read More
Why Reading boss Paul Ince praised Sheffield United chief Paul Heckingbottom aft...

“We knew how tough it was going to be,” Heckingbottom said.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“We’ve watched a lot of Reading and the game didn’t surprise us one bit. We knew they’d be tough to break down and a threat on the counter and we’d have to be patient.

“We had to make changes at half-time, then we made further changes and were patient, kept going, got back in which we deserved and then paid the penalty with a bit of naivety.

“We had to change the shape slightly and then to a diamond to get crosses in from the left. We were patient, kept pushing and did create some good chances in the end.

Paul Heckingbottom applauds Sheffield United's fans after their defeat at Reading: Simon Bellis / SportimagePaul Heckingbottom applauds Sheffield United's fans after their defeat at Reading: Simon Bellis / Sportimage
Paul Heckingbottom applauds Sheffield United's fans after their defeat at Reading: Simon Bellis / Sportimage

“I’d have taken a point when Iliman scored, and if anyone had any money after that they would have backed Sheffield United at that moment. Our big crime was switching off and then not defending the next ball.”

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.