Sheffield vicar beat woman with bamboo stick during decade of abuse, jury finds

A jury has found that a Sheffield vicar accused of sadism repeatedly beat a woman with a bamboo stick over a decade-long period of abuse.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

Hilary Alflatt, aged 87, was accused of treating his victim like a slave and was said to have told her not to look at her ‘master’ when he worked at a church in Sheffield in the 1980s.

Alflatt, who was previously known as Malcolm, now has dementia and was unfit to take part in his trial at Hull Crown Court, where he was found to have committed actual bodily harm over almost 10 years.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The jury was unable to reach a verdict on a charge that he branded the vulnerable woman with a hot needle.

Jurors found Sheffield vicar Hilary Alflatt, 87, committed actual bodily harm over a period of 10 yearsJurors found Sheffield vicar Hilary Alflatt, 87, committed actual bodily harm over a period of 10 years
Jurors found Sheffield vicar Hilary Alflatt, 87, committed actual bodily harm over a period of 10 years

He was cleared of three other counts of causing actual bodily harm which related to more time-specific allegations, and two counts of false imprisonment.

Judge Sophie McKone told the jury: “There's no mystery - you know Mr Alflatt is not here.

“He has dementia, he is in a nursing home.

“I cannot do anything today without some more information.

Read More
Owlthorpe murder Sheffield: Police release update on investigation into death of...

“Although you found he did the acts in count seven, the court does not punish him for that because he is not fit to take part in the trial.

“He is not going to go to prison.”

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

She said her options for dealing with the case were to hand down an absolute discharge, to make a guardianship order or to impose a hospital order.

A hearing to decide on Alflatt’s sentence will now take place on Tuesday, May 3.

The court previously heard how in police interviews, Alflatt had agreed some of the alleged incidents happened, but said they were consensual.

In her closing speech Louise Reevell, prosecuting, had said: “This case is not about an affair and consent, it's about power, control, depravity and sadism on his part.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In reply, Kathryn Pitters, defending, had said: “They formed a romantic relationship and although some of the proceedings that took place may make you raise an eyebrow, the reality, as he puts it, was, 'you don't know what goes on behind closed doors between two consenting adults'.”