Vulnerable young woman let down by Sheffield Council and made to feel partially responsible for abuse, report finds

Sheffield City Council failed a vulnerable young woman many times during an extended period and sought to lay some of the blame for the continuing abuse, an ombudsman report has found.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman (LGSCO) was asked to investigate after the woman and her family felt Sheffield City Council’s own inquiry into her complaint had not done enough to acknowledge the problems the young woman had faced since finding she had been abused.

The Sheffield woman was also told by the city council during its investigation into the abuse she suffered ‘that she could have stopped it sooner if she had spoken up,’ the report states.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Michael King, of the LGSCO, said: “The council has failed this vulnerable young woman many times over during an extended period, at a time when she was most at need of support and even sought to lay some of the blame for the abuse continuing on her. This has had a significant impact on her mental health and delayed her natural progression into adulthood and further education.

Sheffield Town Hall. Picture Scott MerryleesSheffield Town Hall. Picture Scott Merrylees
Sheffield Town Hall. Picture Scott Merrylees

“It is to its credit that the council has acknowledged the significant problems faced by this young woman and her mother, and accepted my recommendations. I hope the changes it has already pledged to make, and the learning it will take away from this case, will ensure young people moving between Children’s and Adult Services will not be put at such a significant disadvantage in future.”

John Macilwraith, Executive Director of People Services at Sheffield Council, said: “We fully accept the findings from the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman and fully acknowledge that we failed to make sure that Ms C had the education, health, and care support that she deserved over a long period of time. This was completely unacceptable, and we are very sorry for this. We have learned many lessons from Ms C’s situation.

“Ms C had the right to these services, and we didn’t act properly for her or Mrs B.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“Ms C now has a detailed plan and is engaged in learning. We have committed to supporting Ms C with her education and this support will continue into adulthood. We are making changes to our systems and have protections and procedures in place to reduce the chance of anything like this happening again.”

The LGSCO report states that because of the impact the situation has had on her mental health, the young woman has been unable to attend college, but the council did not put in place alternative education to ensure she maintained her studies.

The young woman, who has epilepsy and visual impairments, had been provided with a care worker by the city council and the local NHS clinical commissioning group to help meet her needs and manage her seizures.

The report outlines how in 2017, she became increasingly withdrawn until she told her mother her care worker had been disclosing intimate and confidential details about other service users to her and unloading their personal problems. The woman felt angry and disrespected and was concerned the care worker was also breaching her own confidentiality.

The family urged the council to investigate, but it delayed completing its safeguarding investigation into the actions of the care provider. During the investigation, the council told the woman she could have stopped the abuse had she spoken up sooner.

When the family asked for different care workers, the council wrongly told them the only other option involved them paying a 'top-up’ fee.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The woman and her mother also complained that her care plans were not updated properly, and at times were ‘neglectful, dangerously uninformed and posed a danger’ to her. The young woman’s Education Health and Care Plan was also not updated properly, and she was out of education for a significant period until March 2021.

The council has agreed to refund the £605 which the woman wrongly paid towards her care, plus interest. It will also pay the woman and her mother £1,500 each to recognise their distress, and will also pay the woman £500 for every month where the council failed to provide her with education.