Disgraced footballer in bid for freedom from Doncaster prison

Doncaster prisoner Adam Johnson - a former England footballer - faces a wait to find out if he can challenge his conviction for sexual activity with a besotted 15-year-old fan.

Wednesday, 1st March 2017, 8:20 am
Updated Wednesday, 1st March 2017, 9:29 am
Adam Johnson

Three judges at the Court of Appeal in London will announce their decision on a date to be fixed following legal argument on the footballer's behalf yesterday.

The 29-year-old, who is an inmate at Moorland Prison, was sentenced to six years in March following a trial.

Lady Justice Rafferty, Mr Justice Sweeney and the Recorder of Sheffield, Judge Julian Goose, will also give a ruling on a bid by Johnson to win a reduction in his sentence.

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

The former Sunderland and Manchester City winger's trial heard that he kissed and sexually touched the girl in his Range Rover in a secluded spot in County Durham.

Judge Jonathan Rose, when sentencing, said he was satisfied the girl suffered 'severe psychological harm' and that Johnson took advantage of 'a young teenager's adoration of a successful celebrity'.

The appeal judges heard renewed applications for the go-ahead to challenge both conviction and sentence, following a previous refusal by a single judge.

At the centre of his latest fight against conviction is a criticism that the trial judge 'misdirected' the jury on issues of the footballer's 'credibility'.

Eleanor Laws QC, representing Johnson at the Court of Appeal, argued that this must have had 'an adverse and unfair impact on the credibility of Adam Johnson in a case where credibility was the central issue, hence the conviction is unsafe'.

At the start of his trial, Johnson admitted grooming the girl and one charge of sexual activity, relating to kissing her.

He was found guilty of sexual touching and cleared of one charge relating to another sexual act.

The appeal judges will rule on a submission that the jail sentence imposed was 'too much for this offence'.

His QC submitted: "When one looks at the sentencing judge's remarks, he was clearly highly influenced by the fact that the applicant was a famous and successful footballer and, in fact, counted that against him."