Sheffield railways: Ramblers accuse Network Rail of putting walkers at risk by closing crossings to save money
and on Freeview 262 or Freely 565
They say it has ruined Sheffield Country Walk by fencing off a crossing at Ecclesfield Common despite Sheffield City Council threatening to sue.
It has also blocked a popular path linking Wharncliffe Woods with residential areas - despite the line being closed.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdAnd it is opposing official recognition for a path across a closed rail line in Beeley Wood which Network Rail admits has had ‘nil’ misuse, accidents or near misses.
John Harker, Sheffield area official for Peak and Northern Footpath Society, said Network Rail was a publicly-funded body with responsibility to make crossings safe.
But it was using the excuse of public safety to close them to save money. In some cases this was putting people in more danger.
He added: “Network Rail is using the figleaf that they have a statutory duty to be as efficient and safe as possible as an excuse to close as many level crossings as possible.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“The irony is that for every person killed or seriously injured on a level crossing many more are killed crossing busy roads.”
In many cases the paths pre-date the railways, he added.
A crossing at Ecclesfield Common on the 56m circular Sheffield Country Walk was closed by Network Rail in 2022, according to Richard Mills, of Sheffield Ramblers.
The alternative is a two-mile diversion on roads which they say put walkers at much higher risk than from a train.
The walk was launched in 1983 and the crossing was deemed safe for 40 years, they say.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdNetwork Rail says more than 140 trains a day pass at 70mph and electronic kit, which re-created the sound of a train horn, is being phased out.
But in a letter seen by The Star, Sheffield City Council says a safety device has been vandalised and NR has an obligation to maintain the crossing using ‘reasonably practicable steps’.
Meanwhile, it ‘continues to assess its options, including prosecution’.
At Holmes Farm in Wharncliffe Woods, near Wharncliffe Side, a crossing remains fenced off despite the railway line being closed, Mr Mills said.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdHe added: “Closing it deprives a growing population of access to open space, woodland and the Trans Pennine Trail for no obvious reason.”
Network Rail says it is a private farm level crossing with no public access.
And at Beeley Wood, Mr Mills said Network Rail was opposing official recognition for a path over a disused railway line despite it being an important link between suburbs and countryside.
Sheffield City Council supports the proposal and has made an order to include it as a definitive footpath on official maps.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdBut the move is opposed by Network Rail, despite its own website stating there had been no ‘misuse, accidents or near misses’.
Network Rail insisted there was no agenda to close crossings or oppose paths to save money.
A spokesperson said: “Ecclesfield North, which has more than 140 trains a day passing at 70mph, is categorised as high risk and was temporarily closed on safety grounds.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“The temporary traffic regulation order means the public must use alternative routes. This order would not have been supported if it was believed that temporary closure put anyone at greater risk.
“Reopening the crossing would require new protective measures as the previously electronic kit, which recreated the sound of the train horn is now being phased out from active service.”
Network Rail says it has a statutory duty to assess risk on all its level crossings and mitigate risk so far as reasonably practical.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdMany closures had led to replacement footbridges, which can cost several million pounds. Where crossings are safe for use, Network Rail will maintain them. it says.
Sheffield City Council was contacted for comment.
Comment Guidelines
National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.