Bournemouth's Jefferson Lerma given lengthy suspension after Sheffield Wednesday bite

Bournemouth’s Jefferson Lerma has been suspended for biting Sheffield Wednesday’s Josh Windass.

Wednesday, 2nd June 2021, 3:23 pm
Sheffield Wednesday's Josh Windass and Bournemouth's Jefferson Lerma in the second meeting of the side's this season.

The incident took place in Wednesday’s 1-0 win over the Cherries on November 3rd of last year.

A statement from the FA today read, “AFC Bournemouth’s Jefferson Lerma has been suspended for six matches and fined £40,000 following a breach of FA Rule E3 that occurred during an EFL Championship match against Sheffield Wednesday FC on 03/11/20.

“The midfielder denied that his behaviour in or around the 83rd minute of the match constituted violent conduct.

Sign up to our Sheffield Wednesday newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

Read More

Read More
Sheffield Wednesday set to tie down former Arsenal youngster Josh Dawodu after p...

“An independent Regulatory Commission found the breach of FA Rule E3 proven after considering evidence during a hearing. Written reasons for the decision and sanction can be found attached.”

Bournemouth have moved quickly to voice their disappointment at the decision, though, saying, “AFC Bournemouth are surprised and disappointed at the outcome of the Football Association independent Regulatory Commission’s decision to uphold a charge against and ban Jefferson Lerma for six games and fine him £40,000.

“The sanction relates to an allegation that Lerma bit Sheffield Wednesday forward Josh Windass in the Sky Bet Championship fixture between the clubs on 3rd November 2020.

“Since the start of this unnecessarily long process, Jefferson has strenuously denied the charge and has been fully supported by the club in doing so. Both the club and player have fully cooperated with the FA throughout.

“As stated in the commission’s written reasons, the video footage of the incident between the players was ‘not conclusive’. In addition, there was no photographic evidence of any bite mark and Mr Windass – who is described as an ‘unappealing witness’ who ‘gave every impression of simply not caring’ – did not seek or receive any medical attention or treatment.

“Expert evidence was also presented to the commission suggesting that Jefferson was most unlikely to have intentionally bitten Mr Windass, but this appears to have been rejected without due consideration.

“The club believes there was a lack of clear and compelling evidence in finding the charge against Jefferson proven, and the player is currently considering his options regarding an appeal.

“The club will make no further comment at this time.”

Thank you for reading this article, one of dozens we publish every single day to provide you with the best, most up-to-date and most informative coverage of YOUR club. This depth of coverage costs, so to help us maintain the high-quality reporting that you are used to from the football team at The Star, please consider taking out a subscription to our new discounted sports-only package. You'll find all the details at

Your support is much appreciated.