“I am dismayed, as always, by the leniency of the sentences for cruelty to animals”
The RSPCA’s quarterly journal always features two pages of court reports. I am dismayed, as always, by the leniency of the sentences for cruelty to animals. Magistrates will say “But you don’t know the details of the case”, but their leniency is consistent. I think their fundamental belief is that animal-suffering is unimportant.
In the latest journal we had: Cats suffering in squalor: 10-year ban on keeping any animals and no prison; Dead and dying exotic animals in “horrific conditions”: lifelong ban on keeping any animal; 40 hours’ Rehabilitation Activity Requirement; 12 weeks prison but suspended for a year, i.e. behave for a year and you escape prison; Newfoundland dogs left to starve: 5-year ban on dog-keeping only; 4 months prison but suspended for a year.
Admittedly, magistrates work with feeble legislation: our MPs , also, disgracefully, think animal-suffering is unimportant. It is a welcome improvement that Mr. Gove announced last year that the maximum prison-sentence was to be raised from one year to five.