Council scrutiny committee responds to ‘shock’ letter from Sheffield City Trust chairman

A council scrutiny committee that was criticised in a note by the chairman of Sheffield’s biggest leisure provider has replied with its own strongly-worded letter.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

David Grey, chairman of Sheffield City Trust, sent a letter to members of Sheffield Council’s economic and environmental scrutiny and policy development committee addressing issues raised about SCT in meetings.

One of the latest meetings was about a council decision to give a total of £16.6 million to help the trust cope with Covid-19 and reopen venues, during which councillors criticised SCT leadership, including being on holiday during crucial talks.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In the leaked note, Mr Grey said some comments made him ‘incandescent with rage’.

Ponds Forge Leisure Centre. Picture: GooglePonds Forge Leisure Centre. Picture: Google
Ponds Forge Leisure Centre. Picture: Google

Councillor Denise Fox, chair of the committee, and councillor Ian Auckland, deputy chair, since responded with their own letter.

They wrote: “We are disappointed and dismayed to receive your letter.

“The committee has both a remit and a legal duty to scrutinise any service arrangements within its terms of reference and were clearly disappointed that they were unable to ask questions directly of the executive team.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“We are all independent people who take our roles and responsibilities seriously.”

It added they will reiterate the role of the committee at future meetings, asked the monitoring officer to review procedural issues and invited Mr Grey and his team to meetings to provide input on leisure strategy.

In his reply, Mr Grey said: “My letter did not criticise your committee, its processes, or your chairmanship of it. I applaud the concept of scrutiny and feel strongly that the council should be held accountable for its spending decisions.

“However, what I objected to in my letter was not that councillors were asking questions but that they were making unsubstantiated and ill-informed claims and allegations which looked to damage my reputation, that of my trustees and executives and brought the role of SCT into disrepute.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“I hope this clears up my position in respect of the scrutiny board and the good work it does.”

In these confusing and worrying times, local journalism is more vital than ever. Thanks to everyone who helps us ask the questions that matter by taking out a digital subscription or buying a paper. We stand together. Nancy Fielder, editor.