Judge urges wealthy Sheffield businessman to agree truce with estranged wife over court battle

A High Court judge has urged a rich Sheffield businessman and his wealthy estranged Austrian wife to agree a truce after being told how they had run up £1 million in lawyers' bills while fighting over less than £2 million.

Thursday, 20th June 2019, 12:13 pm

Mr Justice Holman said engineering firm boss and Conservative Party donor Sir Andrew Cook and interior designer Baroness Angelika Hirsch-Stronstorff had spent "very, very disproportionate" amounts on legal costs following the breakdown of a three-year marriage.

Read More

Read More
Sheffield Wednesday could be forced to stop using WAWAW motto due to trademark l...

He said they should try to reach an out-of-court settlement which was reasonably fair and put their fight over money "to bed."

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

Sir Andrew Cook.

The judge was speaking on Tuesday at the start of a trial in the Family Division of the High Court in London which is due to run for two weeks.

Evidence showed that Sir Andrew - chairman of William Cook, a firm based just off the Sheffield Parkway, which produces components for the rail, energy and defence industries - was worth about £25 million and Baroness Hirsch-Stronstorff about £4 million, the judge said.

He had been told that no-one was arguing that their combined wealth should be shared.

Lawyers representing Baroness Hirsch-Stronstorff said she wanted to walk away with £2.8 million but Sir Andrew - who was treasurer of the Conservative In campaign, which sought to keep the UK in the European Union at the 2016 referendum - had made an offer of £1 million.

He has increased this to £2 million

They said each had run up lawyers' bills of about £500,000.

Mr Justice Holman said: “You have spent £1 million in costs arguing about £1 million or so.

"It seems utterly, utterly ridiculous."

He said "very disproportionate" amounts had been spent and added: "We are only arguing about somewhere between £1 million and £2 million between people who are worth somewhere between £25 million and £30 million. It is pretty depressing, frankly."

The judge went on: "I really, really think they ought to find some means of reaching an outcome, which is not what either of them want, but which is reasonably fair to each of them and put this to bed."