I noticed the article by columnist Jon Ball about Jarvis Cocker (Star, Wednesday, April 28), stated he and Joe Cocker are unrelated. Maybe Jon could tell us how he researched this information, or was he just repeating what he had previously heard or seen in print? I have seen this statement printed several times in The Star in recent years.
I wonder where this source of information originated because unless Jarvis and Joe had taken a DNA test, who has researched their respective families’ histories extensively enough to prove they are unrelated?
If we meet a stranger we don’t recognise or have never heard of before but has the same surname as ourselves we may think we are not related to that person, but usually only make this assumption by using our own living memories or those of our parents, grandparents or great-grandparents and their knowledge of our related family.
We may sometimes see a person’s surname next to our own in a phone directory thinking we are not related but could very well be, albeit distantly, especially if they were born in the same city and share an uncommon surname with us.
Most Popular
-
1
Rivelin Valley Road Sheffield: Body found after police search of Rivelin Valley
-
2
Hosepipe ban: Reservoir near Sheffield less than 15 per cent full as photos show how water levels have plunged
-
3
Sheffield weather: Met Office issues thunderstorm warning as heatwave set to end with heavy rain and lightning
-
4
High Green assault: Sheffield bus driver punched on his break leaving him with facial injuries
-
5
Rotherham missing boy: 13-year-old missing for 10 days as police make appeal
It’s surprising how quickly families, cousins, cousins-once-removed, second cousins and so on can lose touch in just a matter of a few generations. Contacts can be lost and ties severed when memories of related family fade over the years but research the family name back far enough and you may discover a few surprises!