Hillsborough inquests told Owls consultant engineer threatened to sue Sheffield Council

The Leppings Lane terrace at Hillsborough Stadium.
The Leppings Lane terrace at Hillsborough Stadium.
Have your say

Sheffield Wednesday’s consultant engineer threatened to sue Sheffield Council for £2 million if it scuppered a ground development, the Hillsborough inquests heard.

Dr Wilfred Eastwood ‘became irate’ when an environmental health officer told him the 1986 construction work at the club’s Spion Kop posed ‘a significant safety hazard’.

Ninety-six Liverpool Football Club supporters died after being crushed on the Leppings Lane terrace at Sheffield Wednesday’s Hillsborough Stadium during an FA Cup semi-final against Nottingham Forest on Saturday, April 15, 1989.

New inquests into their deaths are now being held in Warrington, Cheshire, after the original accidental death verdicts were quashed.

The hearing was today told the redevelopment did not meet with the then official safety guidelines.

David Moore, who was employed by the council at the time, said a drop of up to 600 metres on the terrace had the potential to cause fans to trip and fall when leaving the stadium.

He said he was under the impression his concerns would be raised at a meeting of the council’s licensing panel, but was ‘surprised’ when they were not and the club was permitted to use the new Spion Kop.

He attributed the omission to the threat of litigation, the court sitting in Warrington heard today.

Explaining his then role, he told the jury his council department was approached to provide general advice to the club’s safety working group – advice that could not be enforced.

He said he attended a ground inspection in August 1986 and said he considered the Kop unsafe and it did not conform with the Green Guide, a guide to safety in sports grounds.

However, he said Dr Eastwood and the council’s building surveyor boss Arthur Butler did not agree.

Speaking of Dr Eastwood, he said: “I think it is fair to say he quite quickly became extremely upset. He became irate and threatened legal action against the council.”

Mr Moore confirmed to the coroner, Lord Justice John Goldring, that the figure mentioned was £2 million, and the then 27-year-old said he spoke about his concerns to his line manager who he said shared them.

A second site visit took place which involved detailed measurements and the same conclusion was reached and then passed to David Bownes, the council’s then chief licensing officer.

He later received a copy of an internal memo from the director of land and planning to the head of administration and legal which questioned his role.

It said: “It is simply not reasonable for the fundamental basis of the design to be questioned.”

Mr Moore said he attended a subsequent licensing panel meeting – and was surprised no objections were raised.

He told the inquests jury: “Naturally I was disappointed that professional safety advice had not been taken. I felt a political decision had been taken not to raise my concern.”

He said he thought this was ‘due to the threat of litigation’ and he also had concerns about emergency response planning at the club.

He said he asked a number of questions about safety management which the club could not answer adequately and subsequently submitted a report on the subject to Mr Bownes.

Explaining his concerns over the Spion Kop construction, he said: “When you left the terrace to access a gangway to leave the stand, potentially in an emergency situation, there was a significant drop and in some cases that was up to 600 metres, which I regarded as a significant safety hazard.”

He agreed with Terry Munyard, representing some of the families of the deceased, that the hazard would have been people falling or tripping as large crowds exited.

The court heard he was ‘fairly confident’ he had not seen a report referred to by Paul Jackson, a council health and safety officer.

Mr Jackson told the inquest he had been made aware of safety concerns over crush barriers on the terraces in 1988, but was told to ‘keep out of it’ because the matter was ‘politically sensitive’.

He said he also wrote a report saying the absence of an emergency plan meant he recommended Hillsborough should not get a safety certificate to hold matches.

The report went before a committee of councillors and they decided not to act on his recommendations and granted a safety certificate, he said.

However, the jury heard Mr Jackson made no mention of his report in his statement to West Midlands Police in 1989 and there was “no trace” of his report, or a council committee ever considering his report.

Giving evidence, Mr Jackson was adamant the report existed.

Mr Jackson was interviewed last year by officers from Operation Resolve - the criminal investigation into the disaster.

Speaking about emergency planning, he told them: “I am not saying that would have prevented Hillsborough, but it would have reduced the number of dead, because the stewards would have known the gym was going to be used for first aid or that gates A and B had been immediately cleared and ambulances directed in, that sort of thing.”

The inquests continue.