Tahini Lounge: Dronfield restaurant owner fined £500 over fly tipping incident near Sheffield

Christian Kent was prosecuted by North East Derbyshire District Council and order to pay over £1,100 in the prosecution costs on top of his fine.
Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now

The former director of a popular restaurant in Dronfield, near Sheffield, has been fined over a fly tipping incident on a secluded country lane.

Christian Kent, aged 54, was prosecuted by the North East Derbyshire District Council for offences under sections 33 and 34 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In April 2021, a witness observed waste being dumped from a vehicle on Fanshaw Gate Lane, Holmesfield, by two men. The witness provided details of the incident and the vehicle registration to the council's Environmental Enforcement Team, with the investigating officer retrieving evidence from the waste proving it was from Tahini Lounge.

Christian Kent, the former director of the Tahini Lounge in Dronfield, has been fined £500 over a fly tipping incident near Sheffield. (Photo courtesy of Google)Christian Kent, the former director of the Tahini Lounge in Dronfield, has been fined £500 over a fly tipping incident near Sheffield. (Photo courtesy of Google)
Christian Kent, the former director of the Tahini Lounge in Dronfield, has been fined £500 over a fly tipping incident near Sheffield. (Photo courtesy of Google)

Kent was interviewed by Environment officers, as he was the Director of Tahini Lounge at the time and working at the restaurant on the evening of the incident. It was established the vehicle used in Holmesfield was registered to another company Kent was director of.

The Environmental Protection Act 1990 states where waste is illegally deposited from a vehicle, the person who controls the use of a vehicle used to fly tip waste shall be treated as knowingly causing the waste to be deposited.

In court, Kent claimed to be unaware of the incident at the time, but accepted he was in a position to control the use of a vehicle and failing to prevent the escape of waste from his control.

He was fined £500 and ordered to pay a £50 victim surcharge, £1,187.22 prosection costs and £100 compensation to the witness.

Related topics: