Ex-Tory leader calls weakening of anti-obesity strategy 'morally reprehensible"

Former Conservative leader William Hague has attacked the Government for delaying measures to tackle unhealthy eating, branding the weakening of anti-obesity strategy under pressure from MPs ‘morally reprehensible’.

By Nina Lloyd, PA
Tuesday, 17th May 2022, 3:28 pm
Updated Tuesday, 24th May 2022, 4:41 pm

Writing in The Times, Lord Hague said the U-turn, which will see a ban on buy-one-get-one-free deals for foods high in fat, salt and sugar postponed for a year, adds to the "history of failed obesity strategies".

The Government has said it intends to delay the measures for 12 months due to the "unprecedented" squeeze on living standards.

A ban on TV junk food adverts before a 9pm watershed has also been put on hold for a year.

Sign up to our public interest bulletins - get the latest news on the Coronavirus

William Hague

The move has been welcomed by the industry and by some Tory MPs opposed to the state interfering in how people spend their money, but it has alarmed health campaigners.

Lord Hague warned it was a "terrible error" to associate conservatism with a reluctance to protect people, arguing it is in keeping with the party's traditional values to save consumers from being "abused or misled".

He wrote: "Under pressure from some Conservative MPs, some of whom have been threatening to write letters of no confidence in Boris Johnson unless they get their way, ministers have retreated from banning buy-one-get-ne-free deals and from imposing a watershed of 9pm on junk food advertising.

"While some measures, such as rules on the positioning of unhealthy foods by retailers, will still go ahead in October, this U-turn adds to the long history of failed obesity strategies."

Lord Hague added: "MPs who have pressed, seemingly successfully, for the dilution of the obesity strategy are profoundly mistaken.

"They are acquiescing in a future of higher dependence, greater costs, reduced lifestyle choice and endless pain.

"For the Government to give in to them is intellectually shallow, politically weak and morally reprehensible."

Ministers have said they are deferring the buy-one-get-one-free ban so they can review the impact on family budgets in the face of the cost-of-living crisis, and insisted they remain committed to tackling obesity.

Celebrity chef Jamie Oliver described the U-turn as a "wasted opportunity" and said it was proof the Government's strategy was "falling apart" in practice.

The delay was also criticised by former health minister Lord Bethell, who said failure to tackle the "obesity crisis" would simply add to the costs of the NHS.

Greg Fell, Director of Public Health for Sheffield, said: “Our children’s exposure to junk food adverts and careful marketing tactics leads to increased consumption and spending on processed foods higher in sugar, salt and fat. Levels of obesity and diet related illnesses continue to rise at worryingly rates, and the environment we live in makes it increasingly difficult to support our own health. In 2019 our children were exposed to 15 billion advert impressions for junk foods, up from 700 million in 2017.

“The food industry spends around £600m annually on advertising and unless we see an overhaul in how we regulate our environment, to curb commercially motivated pressure towards unhealthy products, we will continue to struggle to halt, let alone reverse, the decline we are seeing in the populations’ health.”

Asked about the Government decision to postpone certain measures to tackle childhood obesity, mental health minister Gillian Keegan said: "The decision has been made to pause by a year and the reason is because the evidence that they put together which showed the behavioural impacts could potentially change as a result of the cost-of-living crisis.

"So, at the time, I think it showed that people were eating more and actually not saving much money because it was more waste.

"I suppose the unknown thing is will people be the less wasteful when we're paying more for food?

"So just so the Government could do some analysis on that.

"They decided to pause it just because the cost of living and food inflation and food cost and none of that was anticipated when the original evidence was gathered."