Millions of people could be left without financial safety net, warns TheCityUK

MILLIONS of people could be left without a financial safety net unless the UK and EU sign an agreement to ensure the continuity of cross-border financial contracts after Brexit, according to TheCityUK,finance sector industry body.

Wednesday, 20th June 2018, 7:00 am
Miles Celic of TheCityUK

TheCityUK claims that 36 million insurance policyholders across the UK and the European Economic Area, and £26 trillion of outstanding uncleared derivatives contracts, could be affected if the UK and EU fail to find a solution before Britain leaves the EU.

A paper published today by TheCityUK – ‘Continuity of cross-border financial contracts post-Brexit’ – argues that the only workable solution to this problem is a coordinated UK and EU response involving both the public and the private sectors.

A spokesman for TheCityUK said: “Firms are urgently taking steps to mitigate the impact on customers and clients. However, without regulatory support across Europe it is highly unlikely that this will be adequate to fully address the problem in the time that remains.”

Sign up to our Business newsletter

Sign up to our Business newsletter

TheCityUK argues that the full range of affected cross-border contracts must be “grandfathered”, either for a limited period, or potentially until maturity.

The CityUK claims that this would protect UK and EEA policyholders and institutions and stop potential widespread financial losses.

Grandfathering is a contract term for an exemption clause that is put in place for a set period when new rules, regulations or laws are implemented to allow companies to continue operations that were approved before the change.

A spokesman for TheCityUk said “grandfathering” had already been used in the coal industry.

The spokesman added: “For example, new regulations on carbon emissions are being applied to proposed plants, while grandfather clauses for specified time frames have been granted to existing coal-powered facilities.”

Miles Celic, chief executive of TheCityUK, said, “This sounds like an obscure issue, but ignoring the question of contract continuity post-Brexit is to play a dangerous game of chicken with the finances of customers across the whole of Europe.

“Without a viable solution, millions of people could be left without a safety net.

“This must not be sucked into the Brexit negotiations. It is a non-political, technical issue and needs a non-political, technical solution.

“Continuing to be able to serve customers and clients is the industry’s number one priority. While firms are doing everything they can, this is not a problem that businesses can fix alone and requires a coordinated UK and EU approach.

“Without it, people and businesses across Europe could be left dangling over a cliff edge following Brexit.”

The issue of contract continuity will affect insurance, pensions, medium and long-dated derivatives contracts, and revolving credit facilities. It may also affect general customer terms of business, prime brokerage and custody arrangements.

TheCityUK’s statement added: “While firms are working hard to find a solution, a number of insurmountable barriers remain which require either regulatory or legislative support.

Some contracts simply cannot be transferred and require special regulatory intervention. Others require new entities to be set up and capitalised, a process which cannot always be completed in the time available.”

Moving contracts from one entity to another also requires customer interaction and clearance which will take time given the scale and number of contracts involved.

The spokesman added: “Finally, regulatory capacity is an issue. Many European regulators will need to take on oversight of products and services they have not previously had experience with and they may need to take on more capacity.”

The “grandfathering” of financial contracts could be achieved in three different ways, according to TheCityUK

The first option is a bilateral agreement between the UK and EU, supported by regulatory co-operation.

Alternatively, separate regulatory action or legislation could be implemented in each jurisdiction, which was consistent with the approach agreed between the UK and EU.

Thirdly, a solution could be included in the EU Withdrawal Agreement alongside appropriate regulatory backing for such a political agreement.

Any of these options would need to be underpinned by ongoing supervisory cooperation between the UK and the EU regulators beyond Brexit, TheCityUk said.