Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Wednesday, 20th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Sheffield Star site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Owls takeover: fan group denies Sheard deal



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 16 July 2008
GEOFF Sheard's hopes of an imminent end to the Wednesday takeover saga are set to be dashed.
Fan group Wednesdayite have denied his claim that agreement has already been reached with them over their shares.

Another major shareholder, Keith Addy, has revealed that in Sheard's offer for his shares he has been given no indication of the kind of investment and plans proposed for the club by Sheard's consortium.

Addy has suggested that Sheard must go through official channels as his next step by approaching financial advisers Deloitte and Touche, who are vetting would-be buyers on behalf of the club.

Wednesday insiders are understood to believe that there are questions about Sheard's finance and plans which have yet to be answered to the club's satisfaction, with the saga now in its sixth month.

Sheard had said that he hoped agreement could be reached with Addy and Geoff Hulley "in days."

Addy has replied to Sheard in a letter to an address in Geneva. He revealed: "The first communication that I have received from Mr Sheard was not directed to me at home, it was to the club and was forwarded to me by the club. That was a week ago.

"I mulled it over for a few days, and there's no indication of what sort of investment or plans that he has got for Sheffield Wednesday. I have sort of said to him that if he has got any further communication, address that to Deloitte and Touche."

Sheard's claim that agreement has already been reached with Wednesdayite, as well as Dave Allen, as been described as "an exaggeration" by Wednesdayite chairman Darryl Keys, who did agree that talks had been amicable and there had been "significant" contact between lawyers on both sides.

The group are awaiting legal verification of Sheard's bid and must then ballot their members, a process that will take 14 days.

At an earlier stage Wednesdayite sent a wide range questions to Sheard that they believe members would like answering.

Just over a week ago the Star revealed that there was surprise in the business world about Sheard's tactic of approaching individual shareholders rather than making a privateapproach to Deloitte and Touche which could lead to an all-encompassing solution for the club.

There were also qualms that other interested parties could be put off if they believed that a deal was already virtually done - whereas in fact Deloitte's efforts are continuing and they have received several expressions of interest.

Sheard has said he has yet to hear from Addy, and that Hulley had responded but had queried the price and further talks were necessary when the Owls director returned from holiday. Addy admitted that Sheard may not yet be in possession of his letter.

Sheard has also said that all four major shareholders, Allen, Hulley, Addy and Wednesdayite, have received the same offer. It is believed to be 20p a share. In April. , sources close to the consortium indicated that 30p was the figure.

Dave Allen recently confirmed that he had received legal verification of Sheard's offer for his holding. The deal was due to be finalised on July 1 but completion was put on hold by Sheard because he wanted the Wednesdayite issue to be resolved first.

Geoff Hulley last night was not available for comment but, in previous times, he and Keith Addy, as Owls fans and long-serving directors, presented a united front on the subject of their shares and ownership of the club, with Hulley saying that the aim was to act in the best interests of the club.

What do you think? Post your comments below.

READ MORE

Angels of Haarlem: Dutch delight for Owls: click here for match report and pictures

Asian talent on brink of breakthrough says Club boss: VIDEO REPORT

Football headlines
More Blades
More Owls
More Spireites
More Rovers
More Reds
More Millers
More Ice Hockey
More rugby league
More rugby union
More boxing
Sports columnists
All sport categories

The full article contains 670 words and appears in Sheffield Star newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 16 July 2008 10:21 AM
  • Source: Sheffield Star
  • Location: Sheffield
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

dizzys dad,

16/07/2008 09:37:27
I fully agree with Keith Addy on this one. The longer this "takeover" drags on, the less confidence I have in Geoff Sheard`s ability to come up with the funds required to move the club forward.
Sheard seems to dither along in much the same way as the current board. Nobody seems prepared to make a decisive move. Everybody involved is waiting for someone else to make a decision. It`s not going to happen!
2

Dave Wilkinson,

Chesterfield 16/07/2008 09:57:22
The current "board" appear to offer no leadership or vision, added to which the pricing fiasco deprives the club of necessary funds and confines the team to the Championship at best.
Addy and Hulley have to realise they hold the club in trust for the fans, and that in the absence of their own ambition no one will thank them for opposing the Sheard bid unless it is manifestly unsound.
3

ozkenb,

Horsley AUSTRALIA 16/07/2008 10:07:51
Is it just a merry go round or a take over deal I wish it would be settled one way or another deal or no deal that the question lets hope it does not fade into the distance like the one last year is it too many cooks ....
you know the rest honestly I LOST INTEREST and may so many others be in the same boat.!!!!
4

we'll be back,

16/07/2008 10:15:42
This whole saga is irritating now; let's have another crack at getting in the prem in our current circumstances- one season up will clear the debt! Sheard seems to be a bit incompetent
5

owl down under,

16/07/2008 10:35:22
THIS BOARD COUPLED WITH WEDNESDAYITE ARE TYPICAL OF INCOMPETENTS WHO FIND THEMSELVES IN A POSITION OF POWER. HISTORY IS RIDDLED WITH SUCH FOLK FROM KINGS TO PAWPERS. RATHER THAN GIVE UP THEIR STRUTTING THEY WOULD SEE WEDNESDAY RUINED. HOW DARE THEY HOLD UP PROCEEDINGS ON A PREMISE OF SHEARDS INCOMPETENCE WHEN THEY HAVE RUN OUR CLUB INTO THE GROUND OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS. ANYONE WOULD BE BETTER THAT THESE INCUMBENTS
6

johnnywalker69,

Chapeltown 16/07/2008 10:53:28
What a very poor article Paul Thompson, there's no wonder why so many Wednesday fans have a hatred for Wednesdayite when propaganda like this is printed. If anyone was just to read the headline 'fan group denies Sheard deal' then they would instantly jump to conclusions, but, reading the article, it just states what we already know, that Wednesdayite have to ballot their members with them being a democracy. Then it focuses more on the fact that some members of the Wednesday board are the ones dragging their heels, what a very poor and misleading article!
7

gold coast owl,

16/07/2008 11:29:09
Jesus Christ what a debacle! Brian Laws is doing an immense job in shielding/distancing his coaching staff and the players from a distraction that could seriously affect on-field performances (as I'm sure it had an impact somewhat last term). Stop in Holland a while longer lads. Good start last night by the way :)
8

Dave Glossop,

16/07/2008 11:58:33
Brian Laws is pants!
9

wednesday surf boys,

cornwall 16/07/2008 12:32:15
Sheard is just a decoy sent in to disrupt the set up in S6.McCABE and his Bacon Lane Mob cant afford to be embarrassed this coming season as they were last year. Ignore Sheard and he will go away. Up The Owls.....
10

maygurney owl,

sheff 16/07/2008 12:33:09
dave glossop wots he done wrong now then mr laws???????
he kept us up and is trying to keep the team together plus a good performance last night?????????
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.