DCSIMG

Sponsored by Rapid Solicitors
Sheffield United's £30m Tevez payout

SHEFFIELD United are set to receive £30 million in damages from West Ham after an independent tribunal ruled against them over the Carlos Tevez affair, it was revealed today.

A compensation figure has yet to be set but Sheffield United are demanding 30,396,897.32 after they were relegated from the Premier League at the end of the 2006-07 season and West Ham stayed up with Tevez playing a key role.

The tribunal's decision is based on Tevez, who was registered illegally, being worth at least three points to West Ham in the relegation fight.

What do you think of the decision? Add your comment below.

The Blades claim relegation from the Premiership meant they lost out on 21,788,795

The figure is made up of TV and merchandising rights and bonus payments paid to Premier League clubs for where they finish in the table.

United also claim they lost 4m from Phil Jagielka's transfer to Everton that summer.

They valued the defender at 8m but a release clause in Jagielka's contract meant he would be allowed to leave if they were relegated and another club offered 4m.

The rest of the claim for damages is based on season ticket sales, sponsorship, catering, club merchandising and 'lost business opportunities'.

Blackwell backs Blades for Arsenal upset

United plc and football club chairman Kevin McCabe said: "I can confirm that the clubs have been notified of the ruling. The arbitration panel have awarded in our favour.

"As the matter is still legal in process, I do not wish to comment any further until we have completed that legal process."

United were not expecting to be officially informed of the verdict until Thursday.

Both clubs understood that they were to be told privately and the news and reaction were set to be released on Friday.

The Star was a key campaigner for United's cause following their relegation, presenting a protest petition to the Premier League.

The secrets to beating Arsenal

The Hammers were originally fined 5.5m by a Premier League panel in April 2007 for breaking transfer rules - including withholding vital documentation - over the signing of Argentine duo Tevez and Javier Masherano.

But the panel decided not to deduct points which would have almost certainly meant the Hammers were relegated.Tevez was cleared to play on and helped West Ham survive on the last day of the season, while United went down. West Ham finished on 41 points, compared to third-from-bottom United who had 38 points, but a superior goal difference.

Now the tribunal, chaired by Lord Griffiths, has decided in United's favour and are expected to reveal their findings today.

The judgment reads: "On the totality of the evidence, we have no doubt that West Ham would have secured at least three fewer points over the 2006-07 season if Carlos Tevez had not been playing.

"Indeed, we think it more likely than not on the evidence that we heard, that even over the final two games of the season, West Ham would have achieved at least three points less overall without Mr Tevez."

It is not yet clear if West Ham can appeal.

READ MORE

Main news index

Blades Watch 08-09 - The Season So Far

Owls Watch 08-09 - The Season So Far

Watch Premiership highlights, international football, golf, tennis, darts and much more

More Blades

More Owls

All sport categories

Your letters.

Features

More Rotherham news

More Doncaster news

More Barnsley news

Check out the very latest on South Yorkshire's roads - including live traffic cameras on Sheffield's commuter routes - with our Traffic section

Latest sport.


loading...
Find It

"Business owner? - Claim your business and Advertise with us"

In association with qype logo

Looking for...

Featured advertisers

Jobs

Search for a job

Motors

Search for a car

Property

Search for a house

Weather for Sheffield

Friday 10 February 2012

5 day forecast

Today

Fog

Fog

Temperature: -6 C to 0 C

Wind Speed: 14 mph

Wind direction: South east

Tomorrow

Sunny spells

Sunny spells

Temperature: -2 C to -1 C

Wind Speed: 9 mph

Wind direction: South west

Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.