DCSIMG

Why register?

CloseX

If you have not signed up previously

It's free and only takes a minute!
Benefits to registering with us
comment on storiesComment on stories
Customise daily e-mail newslettersCustomise daily e-mail newsletters
Arrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions onlineArrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions online
Offers, promotions and deals from partnersOffers, promotions and deals from partners
Add/claim your business on Find itAdd/claim your business on Find it
true
  • 24/05/13
  • 4°C to 9°C Light showers
  • Sheffield 5-day weather forecast

    CloseX

    Saturday 25 May

    Sunny spells

    Temp

    High15°c

    Low6°c

    Wind

    From North west

    Speed10 mph

    Sunday 26 May

    Sunny

    Temp

    High16°c

    Low7°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed13 mph

    Monday 27 May

    Light rain

    Temp

    High12°c

    Low5°c

    Wind

    From South west

    Speed15 mph

    Tuesday 28 May

    Light showers

    Temp

    High12°c

    Low6°c

    Wind

    From South west

    Speed14 mph

    Wednesday 29 May

    Light showers

    Temp

    High13°c

    Low6°c

    Wind

    From South west

    Speed13 mph

  • Follow us
  • Place your Ad
  • Subscribe

Sheffield mum fails to overturn ‘outdated’ law

Legal battle: Laurie Swift.

Legal battle: Laurie Swift.

A MUM who was denied compensation after her partner was killed in a tragic workplace accident has lost a legal challenge at the Court of Appeal.

Laurie Swift, aged 30, was refused a £400,000 payout over her partner Alan Winters’ death because the couple were not married and had not been living together for two years before he died.

Alan was 28 when he was crushed to death at the Davy Markham factory in Darnall, Sheffield, nearly five years ago.

He had just moved into a new house in Littledale with pregnant Laurie when the accident happened.

Six weeks after his death their son Alan Jnr was born, but Laurie has been denied compensation because of a law which bans payouts for unmarried couples or those who have not lived together for two years.

In court, Laurie’s lawyers argued the law was outdated and should be changed.

But Lord Justice John Dyson dismissed the case, saying it was for Parliament - not the courts - to embrace social and economic change.

“There is no obviously right answer,” he said. “It may be many would say the law needs changing. But the choice made by Parliament was not without reasonable foundation and was one which it was entitled to make.”

Alan Jnr, now four, received around £105,000 in damages for the loss of his father. Laurie would have received £400,000.

Laurie’s solicitor Simon Allen said the decision was ‘terribly disappointing’.

“We must stop treating couples who cohabit as second-class citizens,” he said. “Laurie’s case is relevant to millions of young people in the country today and we will be seeking leave to take this to the Supreme Court.”

 

Comments

 
 

Back to the top of the page