DCSIMG

Why register?

CloseX

If you have not signed up previously

It's free and only takes a minute!
Benefits to registering with us
comment on storiesComment on stories
Customise daily e-mail newslettersCustomise daily e-mail newsletters
Arrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions onlineArrange your newspaper/digital subscriptions online
Offers, promotions and deals from partnersOffers, promotions and deals from partners
Add/claim your business on Find itAdd/claim your business on Find it
true
  • 26/05/13
  • 5°C to 16°C Sunny
  • Sheffield 5-day weather forecast

    CloseX

    Monday 27 May

    Light rain

    Temp

    High13°c

    Low7°c

    Wind

    From South

    Speed16 mph

    Tuesday 28 May

    Light showers

    Temp

    High12°c

    Low7°c

    Wind

    From South east

    Speed8 mph

    Wednesday 29 May

    Cloudy

    Temp

    High15°c

    Low8°c

    Wind

    From North

    Speed12 mph

    Thursday 30 May

    Sunny spells

    Temp

    High16°c

    Low8°c

    Wind

    From North west

    Speed13 mph

    Friday 31 May

    Sunny spells

    Temp

    High16°c

    Low8°c

    Wind

    From West

    Speed13 mph

  • Follow us
  • Place your Ad
  • Subscribe

Murder plea rejected

Matthew Stringer - Convicted

Matthew Stringer - Convicted

AN ARSONIST who was just 14 when he murdered his brother in a fire is doing well in prison – but not well enough to justify a cut in his sentence, a top judge has ruled.

Matthew Stringer used white spirit to start the blaze at his family home in Kitchin Road, Wombwell, in 2006.

His mother, sister and two of his older brothers, along with a pregnant woman, managed to escape the blaze by leaping from upstairs windows. However, his 15-year-old brother, Adam, did not wake up as he was wearing headphones and died in the fire.

Stringer – who told witnesses he wanted to kill his mother after his parents separated – was convicted of murder at Sheffield Crown Court and ordered to serve a minimum of 10 years behind bars.

At London’s High Court, Stringer’s lawyers argued his progress in custody had been so ‘exceptional’ he deserved a cut in the term.

Mr Justice Cranston told the court Stringer had improved his relationship with his parents and was now able ‘to talk with them about the happy childhood days spent with Adam.’

He said, most importantly, Stringer now accepts responsibility for his Adam’s death.

However, Stringer faced a ‘high hurdle’ in showing his behaviour was so exceptional as to justify a cut in his jail term and the judge said he had come to the ‘regretful conclusion’ that his progress ‘falls short of that standard’.

 

Comments

 
 

Back to the top of the page