Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 4th July 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Sheffield Star Barnsley site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

St Luke's Hospice park move halted



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
15 May 2008
CONTROVERSIAL plans by St Luke's Hospice to relocate to Norton Nurseries could be at an end after the new ruling Lib Dems announced they will not approve them.
Coun Paul Scriven - who will next week become the Leader of Sheffield Council - today put the political brakes on the proposal to build a new cancer hospice next to Graves Park.

The Lib Dems say they are sticking to their local election pledge to
oppose the plans and preserve the city's parkland.

What do you think? Add your comment below.

Coun Scriven said: "It is obvious there remains strong opposition to St Luke's moving to Norton Nurseries.

"My party made it clear at the local elections that we support that opposition, as we believe in protecting our local parks."

But he added: "However, we also support the first class service St Luke's provides to the people of Sheffield, and we want to see St Luke's develop and flourish.

"Therefore, within two weeks of becoming Leader of the council, I will invite St Luke's to join me in a high level discussion both to clear the air and to find a way forward that does not involve the Norton Nurseries site. The relocation plans have divided the city.

Opponents - including Labour MP Meg Munn - say Graves Park was given to the people of Sheffield by former Lord Mayor and charitable benefactor JG Graves and should not be built upon by anyone.

But last month bosses at St Luke's said more than 15,000 people had signed a petition supporting the proposed move.

They believe the site is ideal for a new hospice, with spacious mainly single rooms for patients, and more resources than they can provide at their present Whirlow site.

Supporters of the move say each room would have access to extensive gardens so patients and their families could enjoy the outdoors, and that the Norton Nurseries site would be renovated and opened up to the public.

A spokeswoman for St Luke's Hospice welcomed Coun Scriven's comments and said: "We note his intention to formally invite us to join in discussions about the future of the hospice."

But she added: "We've made an application to the council, as trustees of the land, for permission to create a world class centre of excellence for palliative care for Sheffield on the Norton Nurseries site.

"The Charity Commission has been consulted throughout the process and has confirmed our application is appropriate.

"We, like more than 15,000 who have signed petitions, sill strongly believe Norton Nurseries is the best site for a new St Luke's Hospice for the city."

READ MORE
Main news index
Latest sport.
Check out the very latest on South Yorkshire's roads - including live traffic cameras on Sheffield's commuter routes - with our Traffic section
Find the wackiest websites on the web and the strangest stories making the headlines, click here for Star Bizarre.
Entertainment news.



The full article contains 489 words and appears in Sheffield Star Barnsley newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 May 2008 11:58 AM
  • Source: Sheffield Star Barnsley
  • Location: Sheffield
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

Parkwood,

Sheffield 15/05/2008 12:55:38
So St Lukes are still attempting to steal Sheffield Parkland, If J G Graves bought the land from a hospital trust surely this would mean he had no intentions or wish for a hospital to be built there,
I would hope that Coun Scriven will do everything to protect the parkland.
2

woodseats willie,

sheffield 15/05/2008 14:46:21
Why do the news reporters always refer to this site as being alongside Graves Park when it is actually in the park? Are they on St Lukes payroll?
3

busylizzy,

15/05/2008 14:54:34
If St Lukes really want to damage their reputation irrerairably they will continue with their quest for parkland. They really do need a reality check and get their priorities sorted.

THEY HAVE LOST THE FIGHT. TIME TO REGROUP AND LOOK ELSEWHERE. Chucking further funds at this is squandering the charity's resourses.
4

Percypink,

Sheffield 15/05/2008 15:00:06
Well done councillor scriven for stopping this devisive attack on our parks.
I am shocked that St Lukes still have not got the message. We are getting into the real damaged reputations territory from now on. Up to now it has only been a waste of money. Support will fall away in droves unless they pull back from the brink.
5

weedavey,

Sheffield 15/05/2008 15:08:14
It is quite astonishing that Saint Lukes cannot see that they have reached the end of the line on this. There is no way forward for them that involves Graves Park.

PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE see sense and look elsewhere. The directors have alienated half the city, they have ruined the hospices reputation and wasted a fortune on this venture that was doomed to failure from the word go.

It is time they got some new management with a grip on reality and got back to patient care and left property speculation to others.
6

alchemist2k8,

15/05/2008 15:17:35
Why do the supporters of the theft of Graves Park keep going on about getting 15,000 signatures as if its something significant? They sent out over 30,000 letters to their own supporters asking them to get 10 signatures each, they had petitions at their shops and shopping centres all peddling thier lies and all they got back was 15,000!! That means that they couldnt even convince their own supporters, never mind the rest of the city. How many of that mere 15,000 were people from outside the city?

Come on SLH, accept the truth, NOONE wants you to build in a park!!!
7

weedavey,

15/05/2008 15:25:06
It is surreal isn't it? Some people just don't know when to give up.
Most people know when to stop throwing money away. There it is different when it is not your money you are chucking away
8

Mrs Sensible,

Norton - very near to the park 15/05/2008 15:29:56
Well I for one would have been happy with it in Norton Nursery, (which IS at the side of the park)

It would have had no detrimental affect other than the disruption cause when building. Shame on everyone who has opposed this, may God help you if you ever get cancer and need the support of the hospice.
9

Redrobbo,

15/05/2008 16:22:25
I think Mrs sensible would be better advised to get her history of Graves Park from the local history library rather than read the rubbish in St Lukes shop windows.
Norton Nursery is part of Graves Park. Pretty obvious really, because if it wasn't the Charity Commission would not have got involved.
Still it is all water under the bridge now. Only people like Mrs Sensible swallowed the lies, whereas the Charity Commission didn't.
Like itor not Norton Nursery will remain part of the park and will not b built on. The sooner people accept that the sooner we can all move on.
10

Stockbrokers,

15/05/2008 16:27:26
I had thought that following the Charity Commission visit that St Lukes might have accepted that they cannot build on public parkland.
Now they have been told by the new council leader and trustee of the Graves Park Charity that they cannot build on public parkland.
Just what will it take to make these people see reality. Are their jobs on the line over this?
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.