Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Sheffield: A city split for rich and poor

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 November 2009
DIVISIONS between rich and poor in Sheffield are growing wider - with the situation today worse than it was 40 years ago, a shock new report today reveals.
The major new investigation was produced by experts at the University of Sheffield after being commissioned and funded by city MP David Blunkett.

People living in the city's worst-off suburbs are falling behind the best-off when it comes to health
, education, jobs and housing, according to A Tale Of Two Cities: The Sheffield Project.

And the report predicts that with the recession biting, the future looks bleak - with huge cuts predicted in public sector jobs, the likely election of an unfriendly Conservative government and a LibDem council which has abandoned old policies of 'closing the gap'.

The university says its findings are impartial and independent - but today the report's publication sparked a furious political row.

READ MORE: SHEFFIELD would be a lot better off without its richest suburbs, clustered together in the parliamentary constituency of Hallam.
Widespread inequalities in health and wealth.
Money needed to help most deprived areas.

Mr Blunkett said he was calling for extra cash to be channelled into deprived areas to ease the problems - insisting he was not calling for a return to the politics of 'class war'.

But the Brightside MP warned that the council's current strategies on grants and funding were threatening to entrench inequality and disadvantage in the city - while admitting his own government had not done enough to tackle the problems.

"I think it is in the city's interest as a whole - I think it is in the interests of the better off - to actually improve the future and well being of those who are less well off," he said.

Council leader Paul Scriven attacked the university's report for 'factual inaccuracies' and said Mr Blunkett should be asking himself why the gap between the rich and poor in Sheffield had got wider under a Labour government and a Labour council.

"About the only thing that is accurate is the conclusion that Labour's policies to close the inequality gap, both nationally and locally, have failed," he said.

"Speaking as someone who is the son of a dustbin man and has come from a modest background, I know just how important it is to tackle inequalities," Coun Scriven added.

The university report contrasts life in the Hallam constituency with suburbs in north-east Sheffield, where life expectancy is lower, there is more chance of being a victim of burglary or road traffic accidents and increasing numbers of people are living in poverty.

Co-author Dr Bethan Thomas said the 110 page report showed in stark detail the inequalities that persisted across Sheffield's neighbourhoods.

And Dr Dan Vickers added: "This report reveals in detail how people's chances of health, wealth, education and dying vary greatly across the city depending on the neighbourhood in which they live.

"With the likely reduction in central government intervention in the coming years and Sheffield council's changed priorities, we fear what improvements there have been may be reversed in future years," he added.

Got a view? Add your comment below.

READ MORE
Subscribe to The Star
Main news index
Your letters
Features
South Yorkshire's environmental news
Kids Zone
More business news
More Rotherham news
More Doncaster news
More Barnsley news
Latest sport.




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 November 2009 1:27 PM
  • Source: Sheffield Star
  • Location: Sheffield
 
Prev
1
2
1

,

02/11/2009 09:34:19
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
2

Vague_Boy,

02/11/2009 10:03:30
"the likely election of an unfriendly Conservative government and a LibDem council which has abandoned old policies of 'closing the gap'"

Hmmmm... who funded this report again?

Given that ZanuLabour have been in power for oh, the last dozen years, who does this report reflect most badly on?
3

Mjb66,

02/11/2009 10:06:35
The gap between rich and poor is far wider since oliver twist was written.
4

GJB,

Sheffield 02/11/2009 11:36:16
I spat out my prawn sandwich whilst reading this!
5

freedom,

Sheffield 02/11/2009 11:46:22
Whilst eating my stale bread and enjoying poverty, I read this article.

I could have told you this years ago. I think I did. Oh well back to chasing the council house/poxy flat (carrot) on a pointless bidding system/via sheffield homes (stick).
6

,

02/11/2009 11:47:39
Comment Reported Unsuitable By User
7

Dave Farrell,

Sheffield 02/11/2009 12:47:53
Put another way: Labour had their chance and blew it along with £1bn of our money. Now Mr Blunkett of the not so run down Chatsworth Estate wants even more money to be thrown at the problem. Perhaps the problem is not just financial poverty but the poverty of realistic ideas on how to tackle the problem.

People can get out of poverty with a good education, genuine job prospects and low taxes on the low paid.

Sheffield has none of the above but plenty of quangocrats and outreach, community, social, welfare project managers to spend all the money.
8

crystal peaks man,

02/11/2009 13:53:18
The thing is those in the north east of the city CONTINUE to vote for the people who have made the situation worse,work that one out??talk about chickens voting for xmass,idiots.
9

Freeman of this land,

02/11/2009 14:57:02
I've never been a LibDem supporter but I agree 100% with Coun.Scriven:.........
Council leader Paul Scriven attacked the university's report for 'factual inaccuracies' and said Mr Blunkett should be asking himself why the gap between the rich and poor in Sheffield had got wider under a Labour government and a Labour council.

"About the only thing that is accurate is the conclusion that Labour's policies to close the inequality gap, both nationally and locally, have failed," he said.

"Speaking as someone who is the son of a dustbin man and has come from a modest background, I know just how important it is to tackle inequalities," Coun Scriven added.

Blunkett and his cronies controlled Sheffield for over 20 years.What a legacy for Labour.

10

Ecgbert,

Sheffield 02/11/2009 15:20:06
The last 60 years has seen Sheffield fall way behind most other cities in the UK because of it's local economic strategy. For all but a tiny number of years since WW2 the city has suffered Labour councils whose only idea has been, like parasites, to grab national tax payers money and throw it at local problems. And Blunkett's only contribution now is to suggest doing more of the same. It ain't worked David, and it never will! Thank god your party is no longer in control here.

The divide across this city exists in all cities - it's just more entrenched here, and built on more fragile grounds. Even on the West of the city where some people earn high incomes, they are mostly earned from the public sector - Academia and the NHS - which is at the mercy of political dogma and control.

The city's population needs to shift it's thinking, to understand that the place has to stand on it's own feet and earn it's living, not be given it through Whitehall grants, subsidies and political whim. The city needs a radical shift to a more grown-up, business friendly environment where wealth is created by commercial investment in sustainable and profitable enterprise.

Unfortunately, there are too many people here who simply don't understand this. The idea that jobs are provided or "given" by government (local and national), not created by a buoyant economy is endemic in this city. Success is a mucky concept that's often been "chased" out of town by political tinkering and resentment.

Prev
1
2

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.