Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


New blow to Woodhead tunnel hopes

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 March 2008
THE Woodhead Tunnel route does not need to reopen to improve South Yorkshire's rail network, a minister has insisted.
Transport minister Rosie Winterton told MPs that neither the Government, the rail industry nor local transport chiefs have identified a need to substantially boost the number of freight trains crossing the Pennines.

She said a decision will be mad
e in 2010 or 2011 over whether to permanently seal the two Victorian Woodhead tunnels - a move which would kill off hopes that the route could be reopened.

Ms Winterton, the MP for Doncaster Central, made her comments during a parliamentary debate secured by Sheffield Hillsborough MP Angela Smith.

Ms Smith wants the 1953 Woodhead Tunnel to be reopened - boosting the entire northern economy, by cutting journey times between Sheffield and Manchester and allowing freight containers to be moved from the North Sea ports across the Pennines.

Her campaign is under threat because the tunnel owners, National Grid, plan to move electricity cables from the two decaying Victorian tunnels into the more modern tunnel. Any decision to then seal the older tunnels and keep the cables in the 1953 tunnel would prevent the route reopening. Ms Smith said: "The whole point of reopening the Woodhead line would be to enable passengers, as well as freight, to travel more quickly.

"In relation to travel to work, the economic benefits of easier access to workplaces are obvious."

Ms Winterton made it clear that there is currently little enthusiasm among ministers and rail chiefs for the route to be brought back into use.

She said: "I am sure she realises that no government or rail industry strategy or planning document has identified a need for additional rail capacity across the Pennines that would require the reopening of the Woodhead route."

She said Network Rail had only identified a need to increase freight capacity on one of the three trans-pennine rail routes - the Hope Valley line between Sheffield and Manchester.

READ MORE
Main news index




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 March 2008 9:05 AM
  • Source: Sheffield Star
  • Location: Sheffield
 
Prev
1
Next
1

rob prior,

sheffield 18/03/2008 10:43:22
I'm very disappointed these tunnels may end up being sealed while Creative Sheffield talk of the need for better and faster connections to both Leeds and Manchester from this city to create a super economy that could rival London in many ways if only we could reduce journey times.
When will those in government realize that the public would use public transport more if it was faster, cleaner and reasonably priced. The environment and especially the Peak District might actually benefit by seeing a reduction in through traffic and our future economy could well expand as well.
2

owlmanblue,

Doha Qatar 19/03/2008 06:52:45
I was the site engineer on the Woodhead Tunnel in 1969 .Our job was to construct the concrete ducts and lay the cables in the old bores now being used. You would thimk therefore that with such a vital and valuable asset, that the existing (decaying) tunnels were worth maintaining.A feasibility study should therefore be undertaken to weigh the costs of replacing miles of cables and concrete ducts aginst a structural repair and the loss of another vital asset.
3

Rory Ridley-Duff,

Penistone 12/05/2008 23:03:43
Ministers saying that a rail link is not needed should try driving from Barnsley to Manchester at 9 in the morning, 3.15 in the afternoon, or rush hour in the evening. 10 years ago, Tintwistle on the Manchester side was already a traffic nightmare. It still is, and residents have called for improved transport for years.

With the massive house-building in the Penistone area, we're now seeing a traffic blackspot developing at the access route to Penistone. I work in Sheffield and have regular contact with colleagues in Manchester. Residents tell me that it used to take 15 minutes by train to Sheffield (it is now about 1 hr by car, and 50 minutes by train). Manchester is nearly 2 hrs by train, and anything from 45 to 90 minutes by car. It used to be about 25 minutes by train.

Opening the train route would take the growing number of commuters off the roads to Sheffield and Manchester in this growing town, never mind the freight arguments. There is no reason the Trans Pennine trail need be lost if the rail link is restored, a path could be built alongside the re-engineered line at negligible cost (compared to the railway).

I would like to see the government report that says there is 'no case' to re-open this line. Nearly 10 years ago (when I first moved to the area), residents were surveyed about transport. What was learnt from that? If they knew we had problems then, why not now?

Our problems may not as acute as the M25, but eventually these traffic hotspots will need to be relieved or we'll be crawling around country roads more slowly than driving in the middle of London!

Rory Ridley-Duff
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.