Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Monday, 12th May 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Sheffield Star site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

New blow to Woodhead tunnel hopes



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 18 March 2008
THE Woodhead Tunnel route does not need to reopen to improve South Yorkshire's rail network, a minister has insisted.
Transport minister Rosie Winterton told MPs that neither the Government, the rail industry nor local transport chiefs have identified a need to substantially boost the number of freight trains crossing the Pennines.

She said a decision will be mad
e in 2010 or 2011 over whether to permanently seal the two Victorian Woodhead tunnels - a move which would kill off hopes that the route could be reopened.

Ms Winterton, the MP for Doncaster Central, made her comments during a parliamentary debate secured by Sheffield Hillsborough MP Angela Smith.

Ms Smith wants the 1953 Woodhead Tunnel to be reopened - boosting the entire northern economy, by cutting journey times between Sheffield and Manchester and allowing freight containers to be moved from the North Sea ports across the Pennines.

Her campaign is under threat because the tunnel owners, National Grid, plan to move electricity cables from the two decaying Victorian tunnels into the more modern tunnel. Any decision to then seal the older tunnels and keep the cables in the 1953 tunnel would prevent the route reopening. Ms Smith said: "The whole point of reopening the Woodhead line would be to enable passengers, as well as freight, to travel more quickly.

"In relation to travel to work, the economic benefits of easier access to workplaces are obvious."

Ms Winterton made it clear that there is currently little enthusiasm among ministers and rail chiefs for the route to be brought back into use.

She said: "I am sure she realises that no government or rail industry strategy or planning document has identified a need for additional rail capacity across the Pennines that would require the reopening of the Woodhead route."

She said Network Rail had only identified a need to increase freight capacity on one of the three trans-pennine rail routes - the Hope Valley line between Sheffield and Manchester.

READ MORE
Main news index




The full article contains 335 words and appears in Sheffield Star newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 18 March 2008 9:05 AM
  • Source: Sheffield Star
  • Location: Sheffield
 
Prev
1
Next
1

rob prior,

sheffield 18/03/2008 10:43:22
I'm very disappointed these tunnels may end up being sealed while Creative Sheffield talk of the need for better and faster connections to both Leeds and Manchester from this city to create a super economy that could rival London in many ways if only we could reduce journey times.
When will those in government realize that the public would use public transport more if it was faster, cleaner and reasonably priced. The environment and especially the Peak District might actually benefit by seeing a reduction in through traffic and our future economy could well expand as well.
2

owlmanblue,

Doha Qatar 19/03/2008 06:52:45
I was the site engineer on the Woodhead Tunnel in 1969 .Our job was to construct the concrete ducts and lay the cables in the old bores now being used. You would thimk therefore that with such a vital and valuable asset, that the existing (decaying) tunnels were worth maintaining.A feasibility study should therefore be undertaken to weigh the costs of replacing miles of cables and concrete ducts aginst a structural repair and the loss of another vital asset.
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.