Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


MPs' husbands lead revolt over jobs ban

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 05 November 2009
THE husbands of two South Yorkshire MPs are leading a revolt against a ban on MPs employing relatives.
Steven Wilson, the husband of Sheffield Hillsborough MP Angela Smith, even warned the tough set of proposals drawn up by Westminster troubleshooter Sir Christopher Kelly could spark legal action.

Seven South Yorkshire MPs face having to sack spouses or other family members within five years following Sir Christopher Kelly's reforms to clean up the discredited Parliamentary expenses system.

Sir Christopher said the employment of relatives is a "very, very unusual arrangement" and is "something that looks extremely odd".

He said: "Frankly, if the House of Commons wants to bring itself into the 21st century then I don't think this practice can reasonably be allowed to continue."

In a bid to ease anger among MPs, he proposed a "transitional arrangement" that will allow those who employ their relatives to continue to do so for one further Parliament, likely to be five years.

But Steven Wilson, Ms Smith's senior parliamentary researcher, and Phil Cole, the husband and office manager of Don Valley MP Caroline Flint have hit out at the proposals.

They issued a joint statement, with the wives of three Tory MPs, urging the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority to reconsider the recommendations.

Their statement said: "We are of the opinion that the family members matter is an employment issue that should have been addressed entirely separately from the rest of an inquiry which relates to MPs' allowances and expenses.

"We are a highly professional group of people, dedicated to serving our MP's constituents."

Mr Wilson said: "There could be court cases and it could be up to the courts to decide what is right and wrong."

Sir Christopher, chairman of the committee on standards in public life, said he had taken legal advice and said the sacking of MPs' family members could be defended "on the basis that this is a proportionate response to a legitimate public objective, in this case the restoration of trust and the integrity of public office holders".

He said legal action following a dismissal would "normally" be taken against the member of staff's employer, which would mean MPs being sued by their own sacked relatives.

Got a view? Add your comment below.

READ MORE
Subscribe to The Star
Main news index
Your letters
Features
South Yorkshire's environmental news
Kids Zone
More business news
More Rotherham news
More Doncaster news
More Barnsley news
Latest sport.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 November 2009 9:41 AM
  • Source: Sheffield Star
  • Location: Sheffield
 
Prev
1
Next
1

all seeing eye,

05/11/2009 11:09:04
Pigs, troughs anyone?
2

Miserable Les,

05/11/2009 11:20:35
As most of our worthless MPs seem to do very little, I can't see as their husbands or wives can have much to do either. No doubt Mps will now start swapping - or should that be flipping - spouses to get round the rules thus maintaining their lavish incomes. Remember who these scroungers are when the election comes next year and with a bit of luck they'll get kicked out.
3

Bradway Lad,

Sheffield, UK 05/11/2009 12:02:41
Mr Wilson/Mr Cole- I assume nobody made you work for an MP, and I'm sure there's no bars on the window of your workplace.
Looks like you're gonna have to work to the same rules that most of us are forced to accept- 'fit in or f* off'. Welcome to the real world- rough innit?
4

Michael, Parson Cross,

05/11/2009 13:47:10
As long as the relatives are paid a market rate salary I don't see a problem with employing family members.
5

Sheffield-born 46,

05/11/2009 14:05:33
They still don't get it do they? They have been found out stealing from the very people they purport to represent and they consider themselves hard done by. None of them deserve to be re-elected at the next election. Let them try to survive in the real world. They could try on my pension with no perks.
6

Scrutiny Trust And Respect,

Doncaster 05/11/2009 20:31:44
Might I add this comment I read in the Independent, relevant to the Doncaster plight on MPs stories:-

"The husband of Ms Flint MP might like to go further and explain why their MP expenses, shown as Legal Fees around £14,000, includes Stamp Duty of about £12,500. Does this mean he shares the benefit just by being married to the MP. Apart from being flabergasted by the receipts on the internet showing it is us that paid the Stamp Duty (wot I thought was a Tax payable by whoever purchased a property) can the husband come clean and tell us what other MP expense benefits an MP's spouse enjoys at our expense. May this not be a good reason why Sir Christopher Kelly is calling time"

Like every other day of every other week of every year we will be amazed if any of the Labour MPs or any of their employed staff take just a little time to give us real answers to these important questions.
7

Byeck,

Sheffield 05/11/2009 21:34:41
My understanding is that Kelly has set a five year time frame for these changes to be implemented, effectively giving these troughers a five year notice period.

This is a tad more than most people get, but, given a following wind, these idiots will have no further interest in the subject after the next election

8

Vague_Boy,

06/11/2009 07:05:08
"The husbands of two South Yorkshire MPs are leading a revolt against a ban on MPs employing relatives."

No vested interest there.
9

Scrutiny Trust And Respect,

Doncaster 06/11/2009 12:01:44
The General Election must be getting near as we start to read articles from MPs in the newspapers. Maybe Ms Flint MP or her staff employed husband should come to the next meeting of Flint Must Go, run as a fight for voters to kick out MPs that just do not get it. The new group is teaming up with Blears Must Go that has had excellent press coverage. Flint and Co can start looking in the job pages of The Star from next week where they will see the real world of work, no free mortgages, no ridiculous expenses, no family jobs..
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.