Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Sunday, 23rd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Sheffield Star site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

CRUNCHED: City centre tower at risk



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 15 October 2008
WORK on Sheffield's most prominent city centre building could grind to a halt - after credit crunch-hit developers changed its look without permission.
The 32-storey City Lofts tower, on Arundel Gate between the Novotel Hotel and the 'cheese-grater' multi-storey car park, is in danger of being left unfinished unless bosses behind the troubled project can come up with millions from the banks.

Councillors were told they needed to agree to allow developers to fit heavily-criticised revised panels to the building to allow the project to stay on track - or risk falling victim to the global financial crisis.

Let us know what you think. Add your comment below.

The original plans agreed for the development - set to become South Yorkshire's tallest building - were of a sleek, glass tower.

But panels fitted over the past few weeks bear little resemblance to the original finish of the building approved two years ago.

Appalled councillors rejected the new look, saying it looked "cheap and tatty" and "like caravan panels" while one said it made it look not like an iconic building but "a con building".

Developers Conran & Partners insist the changes are not cost-cutting measures but are because of engineering problems with delivering the original plan. Les Sturch, Sheffield Council's head of planning, told the city centre planning board he agreed there had been a "diminishing of quality" because of the changes.

But he urged councillors to approve the revised designs - otherwise the project might not get finished at all.

He said: "I think the whole viability of the project is under question. Developers are under severe pressure at the moment because of the circumstances of the housing crisis. Demand for city centre apartments is drying up and the banking centre is in crisis.

"They still have to find 10 per cent to complete the project. The proposed changes will mean the building will cost £1 million extra.

"If there is not agreement on the changes my belief is that the project will stop and that will be hugely problematic for the city and its reputation."

He warned: "I cannot guarantee that the scheme will go ahead, even if approval is given. But if you don't agree to it there is a good probability that it will stop."

The meeting heard the project is costing £400,000 a week and is already 20 weeks behind schedule.

Conran & Partners say because of this they took a "calculated risk" in starting the fitting of the revised cladding panels before they had been agreed by councillors. But councillors threw out developers' demands and were absolutely scathing in their denunciation of the new plans.

Coun John Hesketh said: "I think we are in danger of giving consent to a very large eyesore that will dominate the city centre for generations to come."

Coun Peter Price added: "It just looks cheap and tatty. It is critical that we get this right. It would be better to have it unfinished for a few years than build something that we will regret for a long time."

They voted to defer a decision "minded to refuse" if the same thing came back and told the developers to improve the designs and come back soon.

Grim-faced developers behind the project refused to comment following the meeting. They now have just days to try to come up with revised proposals.

READ MORE
Main news index
More Rotherham news
More Doncaster news
More Barnsley news
Your letters.
Features
Check out the very latest on South Yorkshire's roads - including live traffic cameras on Sheffield's commuter routes - with our Traffic section
Latest sport.

The full article contains 608 words and appears in Sheffield Star newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 15 October 2008 1:40 PM
  • Source: Sheffield Star
  • Location: Sheffield
 
Prev
1
2 3
1

BobBookah,

Sheffield 15/10/2008 09:11:03
How typical of Sheffield! No doubt we will end up with 2 more ugly, soulless buildings which might look ok for a few years but will soon be classed as eyesores. About time we appointed an architecture minister to the council, slowly but surely the skyline of this city is being blighted beyond repair. The council need to grow a pair and tell the developers to stick to the original plans or be sued, and the contract passed to another developer. I'm sick an tired of the way we continue to lag behing Leeds, Manchester, Liverpool, Newcastle, etc.
2

Bradway Lad,

Sheffield, UK 15/10/2008 09:15:36
Makes you wonder if it was the developers intention all along.
3

Hippo,

Sheffield 15/10/2008 09:52:43
This tower *will* be impressive *and* also be a good thing for Sheffield City Centre. However, *not* as it is looking currently I feel. Taking the view that a delay now is better than a few generations of eyesore is the correct and long-term view that we need our elected officials to be taking. The article infers there may be now some bullying tactics on the part of the Developer, saying they won't continue to build it if they ara told to take down what they put up as as "calculated risk", all the while knowing it would look tatty and cheap - shame on them if that is true... never liked that attitude.
4

I remeber,

sheffield 15/10/2008 10:08:30
I agree with Bradway Lad, the current financial crisis is just what the developers want to make more money by installing inferior cheaper materials and of course this council will let them just to get it finished
When will this council stand up?, never I think
5

MuddyCoffee,

woodseats 15/10/2008 10:11:28
I have taken a keen interest in this development since before it started. I have been down to the site to observe and photograph its progress, I have heard comments from interested parties and from people who might want to purchase these apartments.
I am really sad at how they are devaluing and degrading a landmark with such enormous potential with these cheap and ugly panels. This building can already be seen from Rotherham and other points miles from the city it could be a landmark of which our city can be rightly proud. However if it carries on with this shabby looking brown cladding I cannot see anyone wishing to purchase one of the apartments. They were already fairly pricey, but without the stunning glass facade from the brocure with its "balconies" why would anyone want one.
6

Thebigbadwolf,

S4 15/10/2008 12:31:18
A contract would have been signed by all parties, and without consent from the council the original plans have now been changed. That constitutes a 'breach of contract'. Knock it down and tell these developers to be off. The property guru's have lorded it up too long, it's all well boasting how clever they are when things are on the up and they are making millions, but when things turn difficult they want people to feel sorry for them. Todays so called luxury apartments are tomorrow's slums. They are overpriced and in the near future, landlords and property developers will be selling these off for next to nothing to the council to house asylum seekers etc, because they can't fill them. Where will your commercially labelled luxury apartments be then?
7

HotPhil,

15/10/2008 13:43:51
At least they've stopped it before it goes too far. It's important to get this building, however ill-conceived, right. I just fear public money will be used to bail out the bungling planners and incompetent developers.
8

Parkwood,

Sheffield 15/10/2008 13:47:26
I agree with Thebigbadwolf, if they can't stick to the original design, knock it down, and if Les Sturch wants councillors to approve the changes perhaps it's time for him to move on.
9

SleepyHead,

15/10/2008 13:54:22
Why did this get approved in the first place? Are Sheffield councillors so enamoured of Manchester that we have to be exactly like them in all respects? We have our own mini-Trafford Centre at Meadowhall, our own mini-Metro system in the trams, and now our own mini-skyscraper (unfinished).

I'm sure most people would have been quite happy if the council had decided to build something considerably smaller, or (heaven forbid!) not built anything at all and spend the money on renovating existing buildings instead.

Seeing as we're not Manchester could the council for once show a little imagination and try to do something that's less like a poor imitation and more like a genuine attempt to find a unique identity for this city?
10

BobBookah,

15/10/2008 14:46:38
Sleepyhead, Meadowhall was built before the Trafford Centre, and the Supertram was conceived before the Manchester Metrolink, although admittedly opened after.

This city is already unique in being the greenest in Europe, I just don't see why we can't complement the natural beauty in and around Sheffield with elegant architecture...they've proved it can be done with the likes of Leoplod Square, the redevelopment of the train station, the Winter Gardens...it just seems that the council is determined to balance out the pretty buildings with the ugly ones!
Prev
1
2 3

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.