Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 28th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Sheffield Star site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

'Toothless' planners



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

SHEFFIELD City Council has a new corporate strap line: "Sheffield - where everyone matters."
It is ironic then that Paul Scriven's proposed privatisation of 'commercial planning' implies exactly the opposite (Telegraph Friday July 18). In Coun Scriven's 'planet' Sheffield, the strap line is "Sheffield - where only business matters."

Coun
Scriven's prognostications betray a profound ignorance of the planning system: there is no such subset of planning known as 'commercial planning', for example. The culture change he advocates is no less than the abandonment of the 'public service ethos', in which planning officers are publicly accountable to democratically elected councillors, rather than vested business interests. He also appears to have completely missed the profoundly positive effects the planning service has had on the quality of development in Sheffield over the last five to 10 years.

Sheffield is rightly recognised as having been the subject of carefully considered, coherent and high quality regeneration initiatives, as opposed to the often ill-conceived, chaotic and incoherent redevelopment that cities and conurbations, like Leeds and Manchester, have been subjected to.

Paul Houghton of Grant Thornton, who are presumably favourites for the consultancy commission to put Coun Scriven's flawed vision into practise cite unspecified "stumbling blocks in the way of affordable development and stifled business opportunities", in their, as yet, unpublished report.

Presumably, he is actually referring to the aspiration to secure high quality design, materials and build quality developments within Sheffield, and comply with local and national planning policy and guidance.

Let it be absolutely clear: there are very few developments in Sheffield where planning has not played a pro-active role in improving design quality, and ensuring development is bespoke to Sheffield. This is as it should be ---- unless you are Paul Houghton or Coun Scriven.

Equally, in enacting local and national policies and guidance, planners in Sheffield are doing what every local planning authority is obliged to do. Privatisation or "the axe" as the heading so pithily put it is therefore, in effect, shooting the messenger, and again displays a significant ignorance of how the planning system works.

What Coun Scriven and his colleagues in the business community appear to want from planners is for them to be a group of toothless 'yes' men and women, eager to comply with business's every whim, irrespective of the wider public interest or, indeed, local or national planning policy considerations. Out must go democratic accountability and scrutiny, in favour of a business friendly planning service. There is a town not far from Sheffield, where planning became very, very business friendly in the recent past; it is called Doncaster. There is no more which needs to be said.

Name and address supplied.

READ MORE
Your letters.
Today's features.
Latest sport.
Main news index.




The full article contains 457 words and appears in Sheffield Star newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 August 2008 8:12 AM
  • Source: Sheffield Star
  • Location: Sheffield
 
Prev
1
Next
1

sheff5lad,

Sheffield 05/08/2008 15:44:06
As I look upon my Citys increasingly chaotic skyline and gaze, in awe, at the "cheese grater" to say nothing of the "kit-kat" I am consoled in the knowledge that these hideous abominations are a part of " carefully considered,coherent and high quality regeneration". I am further staggered to be informed they are not,"ill-concived,chaotic and incoherent developments".

Well,if thats so ,I ll go to the foot of our stairs!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.