Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Plans for new supermarket are thrown out

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 25 November 2009
PLANS for a new Aldi supermarket near Sheffield's Crystal Peaks shopping centre have been blocked amid fears it could jeopardise another proposed development.
The budget supermarket chain applied to build a store next to Damon's restaurant on Sevenairs Road, opposite Crystal Peaks but councillors voted it out after hearing a range of objections.

An officers' report said priority should be given to a pro
posed retail site at Waterthorpe, on the other side of the shopping centre, where shoppers would not have to cross a main road and would be closer to bus and tram stops.

But Aldi's property director, Mark Taylor, told councillors the proposed store would increase choice and value for residents and create between 20 and 30 jobs, as well as construction work.

He said: "We are committed to developing this location, which is a brownfield site, whereas there is no timescale for Waterthorpe, which is on a greenfield site."

Resident Jacqueline Baker said: "We have needed a store here for many years now."

But other neighbours complained the development would add to problems of traffic, parking and anti-social behaviour.

Ward councillor Helen Mirfin-Boukouris and Attercliffe MP Clive Betts also made the case for refusal, to applause from a packed Town Hall.

Residents' representative Roger Pateman questioned why the Waterthorpe site was being taken into consideration, as it has not yet received planning approval and residents have not been properly consulted.

Councillors on the city centre, south and east planning board voted against the scheme because more appropriate sites were available.

Later Clive Betts said: "I'm delighted. This was the wrong site, and the planning board recognised that the parking proposals were totally inadequate and that the additional traffic that would be generated would simply add to the local congestion."

- The board approved plans for a convenience store on the site of the old Hatfield's car showroom off Abbeydale Road South - despite residents' objections that traffic problems would be made worse by delivery lorries.

Got a view? Leave your comment below.

READ MORE
Subscribe to The Star
Main news index
Your letters
Features
South Yorkshire's environmental news
Kids Zone
More business news
More Rotherham news
More Doncaster news
More Barnsley news
Latest sport




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 November 2009 8:18 AM
  • Source: Sheffield Star
  • Location: Sheffield
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Gregory D,

Sheffield 25/11/2009 10:09:48
It's great to see supermarket proposals refused but you jobsworths at the Council have it all wrong.
We don't need more supermarkets because we have enough. Supermarkets limit choice and asphyxiate the market by offering nothing but bland produce and using bullying tactics to close down local traders who sell better produce but don't undersell themselves.
Crystal Peaks is already a large retail park that ought to be closed down, telling yet another supermarket firm they can't open on a site where some idiot wouldn't be able to cross the road is nonsensical. It's not the issue!
Off the mark as usual.
2

JANE N,

Sheffield 25/11/2009 12:42:53
Sorry GregoryD in Sheffield - what do you mean close Crystal Peaks down - are you insane???? or do you live in the north of Sheffield???
3

jonboy,

Sheffield 25/11/2009 16:58:41
What is Gregory D rambling on about.
Has he not noticed the Market at Crystal Peaks which is full of independent local traders. There is only one supermarket and a very good one at that
4

RX,

Sheffield 25/11/2009 18:38:06
A convenience store at Hatfields? To complement the Tesco express not half a mile down the road, that drove an existing retailer out of business?
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.