Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

The Car People

Evicted man moved in 150 yards away

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 November 2009
A NEIGHBOUR from hell was evicted from his Sheffield council flat after terrorising pensioners - but then moved in with his girlfriend on the next street.
Residents said they were relieved when James Johnson, aged 35, was forced to leave his old home in Ridal Avenue, Stocksbridge, on October 23.

But they were furious when they discovered he was still living in the area at his girlfriend's flat in Ri
dal Close.

One furious resident, who did not wish to be named, said: "James Johnson has been terrorising the area. People suffered criminal damage, the blocks of flats have been graffitied, and little old ladies have been threatened by him.

"People were relieved when he was evicted - but were not so happy to find him living 150 yards away from his old home, with his girlfriend."

However, housing management company Sheffield Homes said it is also taking Mr Johnson's girlfriend to Sheffield County Court for an eviction hearing later this month.

She also faces allegations she made other tenants' lives a misery, through loud music and rows late at night.

Lorraine Greeves, manager of the company's anti-social behaviour team, said: "Mr Johnson was evicted from Ridal Avenue for anti-social behaviour. We understand he has since moved into his partner's property. His partner is due to attend a hearing on November 24 and 25 due to her alleged anti-social behaviour.

"The proceedings are for the purpose of taking possession of the property as a result of her breaching her tenancy agreement."

She added continued anti-social behaviour from Mr Johnson would be used as further evidence to evict his partner.

Ms Greeves said: "All tenants are responsible for the behaviour of guests and visitors at their property."

When the Star called round neither Mr Johnson nor his partner were available to comment.

Got a view? Add your comment below.

READ MORE
Subscribe to The Star
Main news index
Your letters
Features
South Yorkshire's environmental news
Kids Zone
More business news
More Rotherham news
More Doncaster news
More Barnsley news
Latest sport



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 09 November 2009 7:34 AM
  • Source: Sheffield Star
  • Location: Sheffield
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Jerry-Co,

09/11/2009 09:02:27
Lets hope dole office know they are a couple... oops... they do now!
2

s36inspain,

spain 09/11/2009 13:18:22
and thats why!!!!
3

SheffieldsBiggestClub,

Bladeland 09/11/2009 16:26:23
And what do you think will happen next?
They will be housed somewhere else.They arent left to live on the strrets!!!
4

hard2miss,

09/11/2009 17:02:22
Ms Greeves said: "All tenants are responsible for the behaviour of guests and visitors at their property."

They would have to prove that to be the case and could not bring it up in court that he lives their and there fore she should be evicted. If he stays sociable then they should not be allowed to mention him in court as he is not part of the charges against her. I bet that they do tho and use mud to get her out. If he keeps clean at her abode and they bring him up at her trial then if I was her I would go strieght in for an appeal.

I bet it did not go down well when the Star went round and they did not come out kicking off and further sensationise the story. They did the best thing and stayed well clear, at least they have some sence, now lets see if this bloke has the sence not to help them get his girlfriend evicted.
5

stevee,

09/11/2009 18:49:10
blokes like him don't have any sense or he wouldn't have got evicted in the first place, and any evidence of nuisance/anti social behavour can be used at her court hearing
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.