Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Tuesday, 7th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Sheffield Star site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Viewpoint: Why city needs steel and glass . . .



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 May 2008
CAN we please have some balance in the debate over the development of the city centre, in particular the 'old-versus-new' argument?
The Star has given countless column inches to those who wish to live in the past (including Susan Richardson who thinks Sheffield's Victorian facades should be preserved at all costs).

We then had the final insult of Andrew Costa claiming that these old buildings should be there for the benefit of him and his mates to fly-post upcoming music events, saying that fly-posting 'actually improves the environment'. And he has the gall to complain about the council, calling them vandals.

Let's have another opinion: Sheffield is at least 50 years behind near neighbours Leeds and Manchester in terms of modern, exciting and innovative city centre development and we always will be while the likes of Mr Costa and Ms Richardson enjoy disproportionate column inches.

Inward investment and a thriving city centre is dependent on one thing only: progress.

It's why there are no workhouses, no chimney sweeps, no rag and tag and no Co-op cafes any more.

It's why Manchester's bars, nightclubs, shops, restaurants and hotels are full with tourists and domestic visitors and why ours are not.

It's why Leeds and Manchester continue to enjoy all the benefits of foreign investment and national and international showcasing and why we do not.

It's also why Sheffield needs multi-storey steel and glass towers (thank goodness for each and every one of the 32 storeys at St Paul's) if it is to prove to the world that it is keeping pace with the rest.

It's why we need to rid ourselves of old-fashioned eating establishments such as the "sadly missed" Castle House roast beef and Yorkshire pud restaurant (don't make me laugh); it's why Sheffield needs contemporary restaurants.

So here is the alternative viewpoint, which I suggest is the view of the majority of the 540,000 sensible occupants of the UK's fourth largest city: knock down the old, environmentally unfriendly Victoriana, build steel and glass towers that rise to the skies, proclaiming that we have finally shed our old industrial appearance.

I am proud of my city; I was born here and have spent 59 years here and will die here. I am proud of my heritage and would do anything to protect it, but heritage is about so much more than preservation.

And before I am accused of it, I am not a philistine who wants to create some Orwellian metropolis, but I am realistic enough to look 40 miles north and 40 miles west and see that we are being left behind by two places that, quite frankly, can't hold a candle to Sheffield.

And it saddens me.

Change is inevitable, and managed change is healthy.

To oppose everything for the sake of it, as many of your recent contributors have done, is a sure death knell for my city. If people want to live in the past, go and live in Stratford-upon-Avon and let me and the rest of us live in, and be proud of, a clean, graffiti-free modern, vibrant and exciting Sheffield that competes with the rest.

The times they are a-changing.

Read more from our columnists
Main news index

The full article contains 553 words and appears in Sheffield Star newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 May 2008 8:21 AM
  • Source: Sheffield Star
  • Location: Sheffield
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.