Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 22nd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the Sheffield Star site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Tracks of our tears: Mixed reaction to ticket barrier plans



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 19 September 2008
THOUSANDS of people would be barred from using Sheffield station footbridge if plans for ticket barriers go ahead.
East Midlands Trains wants to cut fare dodging, but it would shut a safe, well-lit, direct route between Park Hill and the city centre used by residents, workers, shoppers and visitors.

After protests the company now has plans for a residents' permit, but the bureaucracy involved could result in many, including hundreds of students who live in the area, being excluded.

Campaigners say conductors are the best way to boost revenue and barriers would deny a community access to facilities which have cost taxpayers millions.

But EMT says manned gates would also improve safety on the station, and the police are supportive.

Got a view? Add your comment below.

Action Desk talked to those on the wrong side of the tracks.

Dr David Bottomley, aged 49, works in a health centre in Park Hill and shops in the station for lunch.

He said: "There are quite a few people working in the area who use the station because it's by far the best way into the city. How much would it cost Sheffield if they couldn't do that?''

John Boothroyd, aged 74, of Gleadless, said he approved of moves to halt fare dodging.

He added: "I believe there are quite a few who manage to travel free from Chesterfield and Dronfield.

"But these barriers would need to be manned permanently because my travel pass won't scan."

Susan Teather, aged 52, of Halfway, said she supported barrier plans because it would improve safety in the station.

She said: "I don't think it should be a shortcut, it's busy enough with passengers.

"Barriers would also keep the druggies and vagrants out. I sometimes have to share a waiting room with them in the morning and it's not nice"

Roger Pease, aged 66, from Bath, said: "You're lucky to have an open station. Where I live you get your ticket examined many times during the journey and when you go through the station as well."

Melvyn Johnson, aged 61, of Hillsborough, said 'pass through' tickets should be reintroduced.

He added: "You could get platform tickets when I was a kid and they should put a ticket office on the Park Hill side."

Chris Goodyear, aged 22, of Deepcar, parks in Norfolk Park and crosses the bridge to shop in the city centre.

He said: "It would be really inconvenient for me."

Barriers could be introduced in spring. Sheffield council has a feedback form at www.sheffield.gov.uk

READ MORE
Main news index
Your letters.
Features
More Rotherham news
More Doncaster news
More Barnsley news
Check out the very latest on South Yorkshire's roads - including live traffic cameras on Sheffield's commuter routes - with our Traffic section
Latest sport.

The full article contains 475 words and appears in Sheffield Star newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 September 2008 7:23 AM
  • Source: Sheffield Star
  • Location: Sheffield
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Lil Sal,

21/09/2008 13:33:03
What a stupid idea! Must be lots of "fare dodgers" to make it cost effective, why not employ a couple of extra inspectors?
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.